Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is no other name under Heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved, Acts 4:12. My wife and I hope that our Blog may be used as a tool to promote the gospel of Jesus Christ. We desire to minister His message of salvation to anyone who is willing to hear us. We believe His free gift of salvation is available to all, and we invite whosoever will to come and take freely of the water of life, Revelation 22:17.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
The Myth of Evolution
Science tells us that re-shuffling of or losing (through mutation) genetic information is what causes the physical differences we see in living things. These small differences are called "micro-evolution" and result in, for example, different breeds of animals of the same kind, like dogs and wolves.
For Darwinian evolution to be true, however, big changes had to occur and that is called "macro-evolution." "Macro-evolution" describes changes that would result in different kinds of living things, like dinosaurs changing into birds. This type of evolution has never been observed in the fossil record, nor is it seen happening today.
"Micro-evolution" does happen today and is observed in the fossil record--this is consistent with the Bible. Unforunately, evidence that comes from "micro-evolution" is used to convince people that "macro-evolution" happened. That evidence has been misinterpreted.
Evolutionists believe that, with enough time, the little changes will add up to big changes and make new things of living things. But that is not how it works. "Genetically speaking" this is like believing if you 'break-even' or lose money every time you sell something, you will eventually become a millionaire. That just doesn't make any sense.
Remember, creationists and evolutionists have the same evidence--we just interpret it differently. So, the next time you are shown evidence for evolution, ask yourself this question, "Does this evidence demonstrate "micro-" or "macro-" evolution?"
Micro-Evolution Vs. Macro-Evolution
Darwin observed this on the Galapagos Islands
Darwin believed this, but had no evidence
Mendel observed this in his laboratory
Mendel demonstrated this could not happen
Small changes occur, but within limits; changes in color, hair length, beak size, etc
Requires unlimited, major changes; new body plans, organ systems, etc
Changes occur in pre-existing living things
Life came from non-living chemicals
We observe this today, for example, in dogs
This has never been observed
Pre-existing genetic information: shuffled or lost; natural/artificial selection (breeding)
Requires new genetic information to be selected out by natural selection
Mutations occur, but they are neutral or actually reduce genetic information
Mutations must increase genetic information; this has never been observed
Occasionally mutations produce a survival benefit that comes from a loss of something
Over millions of years, information-losing mutations will make something new (what?)
Photographs
Drawings
Science
Faith
For more information, read "In the Beginning" by Walt Brown.
1 comment:
"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness," 2nd Timothy 3:16.
My wife and I welcome comments to our Blog. We believe that everyone deserves to voice their insight or opinion on a topic. Vulgar commentary will not be posted.
Thank you and God bless!
Joshua 24:15
Great post, Ian.
ReplyDeleteThe facts are the same whether one is a creationist or an evolutionist. We tend to filter those facts and reject any that do not fit our preconceived ideas. Intellectual honesty requires that one examine their own position for flaws, by reviewing the evidence for contradictions. This frequently requires going against the accepted view. that is not popular in our day.