3:1 Wherefore,
holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High
Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus
This verse is a succinct appeal for the believer (the
writer’s brethren) to consider Jesus Christ. The Greek word for “consider” is
“kataneuo” and means “the action of the mind in apprehending certain facts
about a thing.” This same verb is used once more in Hebrews in regards to our
fellow Christians when we read: “Let us consider one another in order to stir
up love and good works,” Hebrews 10:24.
The word suggests entrance into
a deeper state of understanding than we presently possess in order to better
function or interact with the object in question. With our brethren we are to
consider them in the respect that we become part of their life, interested in
their pursuits, close without pretending. In Christ it means that we are to
consider Him, in this verse, as both an Apostle and the High Priest of our
profession.
The Christians who first read this epistle were partakers
of the heavenly calling, but by virtue of their conduct were not always
partakers (partners or fellow laborers) of Christ. It is as though we have
entered a massive inheritance, an incredible fortune that has been freely given
us, but with it comes the responsibility of knowing the giver’s will and
furthermore executing it. Some Christians perish for lack of knowledge. They
have been saved by grace through faith and enter into eternal life, but partly
through their own fault and partly through poor teaching, they learn little
about their Lord. Some Christians perish for lack of execution. They are
stalwart towers of theological knowledge. They are reservoirs of doctrine, dead
languages, creeds and confessions. But all of this does not enter into
practical, daily living and thus they never become partakers of Christ, bearing
fruit for eternal life. They become highly skilled at telling others what ought
to be done, but are so busy with the telling that they forget the doing. I
counsel all Christians to be more in mind like the latter than the former, but
more in heart like a true disciple. Disciples were known in the first century
for emulating Christ very closely in their conduct and deeds, which is one
reason, I am sure, they were called “Christians.” It sounds like a name that
might have begun as a mockery toward those who followed, “the Way.”
Notice how the writer draws our attention to the simple
fact that Jesus Christ is our High Priest. This is one reason I believe the
concept of clergy/laity and even pastor/congregation is not correct for the
church. There is one teacher and all are brethren. The OT priesthood had a high
priest and a body of priests from Levi that were elevated and separated from the
rest of the people. I do not believe Jesus intended to replicate this model for
the church, but to set it down and put it away, since the priesthood was a
reflection of all Christians, with the high priest a shadow of Himself. In the
final book in the NT canon we are twice reminded that all Christians are
priests to God, Revelation 1:6; 5:10. A ruling body of elders removes the
elevation of any one individual assuming the mantle of power. Power corrupts,
and left in the hands of the few, it indeed corrupts absolutely. Rome, as well
as many “organized” churches and denominations clearly reveal the damage this
has done.
You are right that these titles setting one above others is wrong. Pastor, Bishop, Elder, and Evangelist were not intended as titles, but as Job descriptions, and Matthew 23;8-10 explicitly forbids using these types of titles. Unfortunately, most of those who are most concerned about the title they have don't seem to understand the job description. If they understood their job, the title would mean very little to them.
ReplyDelete