“And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb
bearing seed, which is upon the face
of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and
to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth,
wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat:
and it was so. And God saw every
thing that he had made, and, behold, it
was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day,” Genesis
1:29-31.
Here is yet another contradiction between Genesis and
Evolution. Our primitive ancestors, according to the latter, were hunters and
meat eaters from the beginning; they didn’t begin to cultivate crops or harvest
the land for a long time after mankind’s arrival.
Only after our cultures
evolved did planting and raising crops become a viable source of nourishment to
our ancestors. God relates that in the beginning Adam, Eve and every animal
“wherein there is life” were vegetarians. That is, our race began by eating
herbs, vegetables, and fruit, along with every animal that roamed the earth,
flew through the air, or crept along the ground. It is not said of the
creatures filling the sea that they were herbivores; either they were exempt
and did feed on one another or the writer felt it unnecessary to include them
presently.
Dinosaurs, lions, and other predators ate vegetables?
That is what the language of the text implies. Actually, I would say that it
plainly declares it. Perhaps the ground prior to the Flood yielded green food
that was extremely nutritional and supplied all the wants of the body. Perhaps
that also lent to the extreme ages that our ancestors lived to. For instance,
Adam lived to be 930 years old, Genesis 5:5. The very old age might also
account for the massive size of some creatures, including many dinosaurs. When
the Flood passed longevity plunged in a few short generations, and so too would
be the chance for such creatures to grow as large as their forebears once did.
God called all that He had made “very good.” Looking back
on the panorama from Evolution’s perspective, one would have to wonder why our
God would consider the deaths of trillions of living beings prior to man’s
arrival “very good”? Man inherited a world already littered with a titanic
amount of death and suffering. Here we come to the final and most awful flaw of
Theistic Evolution, and this is the one point I beg you to listen to, if you
are a Christian and subscribe to this theology.
We know from Scripture that when Adam disobeyed, sin
entered the world, Romans 5:12. As the husband of Eve he was the one God held
responsible for his stewardship. Paul also writes that through sin death came
as a curse; not only to all living things but to the universe in general, Romans
5:12, 14; 8:20-21. The general teaching of the Bible (Old or New Testament) is
that sin is an aberration to our race; God did not create us to die. It was not
His original intent for us. Death is sin’s curse and a constant reminder that
we are Adam’s descendants and like Adam we need reconciliation with our
Creator. Death is the consequence of one man’s actions as God’s appointed
steward, Romans 5:17. Jesus our Lord was manifested to take away sin and to
conquer death by taking upon Himself our sins and dying the death we deserved.
Since Christ already died for the totality of mankind’s collective sins we
needn’t likewise suffer that fate and receive eternal separation from our
Creator as a penalty for being sinners in Adam’s likeness, Romans 5:18-19; 2nd
Corinthians 5:21.
Evolution (even Theistic Evolution) paints a grimmer
picture. Death is the natural result of progression, and there is nothing
unnatural about it. Death heralds change as species evolve to ever more
advanced states. The problem being then is that death existed long before a
conscious being capable of making moral choices was present to defy God’s will.
Death lacks any moral quality. It is not evil; it is not tragic; it is not the
consequence of sin. It simply is. Sin, the supposed result of Adam’s rebellion,
is a fiction since death occurred trillions of times prior to “Adam’s” or
mankind’s arrival. Christ came as the Savior of sinners to ransom us from
death. If death’s existence prior to any being capable of sinning is true, then
Jesus was not a Savior of anyone, since there is nothing to save us from. Death
is natural; death is progress. Death is not a divine judgment for mankind’s
rebellion. Christianity then is a fraud, and so too was our Savior, who was
clearly deluded to believe that sin was the cause of death, 1st Corinthians
15:56. He was also deluded to believe that God created Adam and Eve “at the
beginning” (Matthew 19:4) or more specifically “from the beginning of the
creation,” Mark 10:6.
So which side does a Christian stand? Evolution touts
much but has yet to produce evidence that validates its lofty claims. The Bible
has been a book vindicated historically, scientifically, and spiritually for
countless centuries, and it will endure long after the theory of Evolution has
been laid to rest. Are we really so afraid of the opinions of men that we will
not stand for God’s word and truth? Recall Jesus’ words when He asked, “Nevertheless
when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?” Luke 18:8. Each
of us must answer this question individually. My prayer for my brothers and
sisters in Christ is that we each answer it well.
Like you, I find that theistic evolution is even more untenable than plain evolution. It resolves none of the contradictions between creation and evolutionary thinking but introduces additional problems as you point out.
ReplyDeleteAlso as you pointed out none of the scientific evidence indicates evolution as valid, and some is in clear contradiction to the theory.
Clara Lucas Balfour writes: "Mankind struggles upwards, in which millions are trampled to death, that thousands may mount on their bodies." This is an apt and brief description of Evolutionary theory. This would also be the God of Theistic Evolution, if God indeed used it to advance species. What Christian, in good conscience to the revelation of Scripture, can accept this statement as being compatible with God? This concept severely maligns God's character.
ReplyDelete