tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174647220824134633.post8058297710723521848..comments2024-02-29T10:31:18.505-06:00Comments on What's in a Name?: The Riddle of Theistic Evolution, Part 6Ian Curtishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11027275808408069964noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174647220824134633.post-29355843352190839062012-06-02T12:17:18.369-05:002012-06-02T12:17:18.369-05:00Clara Lucas Balfour writes: "Mankind struggle...Clara Lucas Balfour writes: "Mankind struggles upwards, in which millions are trampled to death, that thousands may mount on their bodies." This is an apt and brief description of Evolutionary theory. This would also be the God of Theistic Evolution, if God indeed used it to advance species. What Christian, in good conscience to the revelation of Scripture, can accept this statement as being compatible with God? This concept severely maligns God's character.Ian Curtishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11027275808408069964noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174647220824134633.post-40299183177765338742012-05-11T09:18:48.640-05:002012-05-11T09:18:48.640-05:00Like you, I find that theistic evolution is even m...Like you, I find that theistic evolution is even more untenable than plain evolution. It resolves none of the contradictions between creation and evolutionary thinking but introduces additional problems as you point out. <br /><br />Also as you pointed out none of the scientific evidence indicates evolution as valid, and some is in clear contradiction to the theory.Donald Fishgrabhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11977970195032209188noreply@blogger.com